| Objectives
Topics 1
Research Design
Topic 2
Designs for Nursing Research
Topic 3
Concepts Relevant to Design
Topic 4
Design Validity
Topic 5
Good Study Design
Topic 6
Modeling study design
References
|
| |
Objective 4: Discuss the following concepts relevant to design |
| What concepts are important to understanding research design? |
Causality, multicausality, and probability
- Causality – This describes a relationship between two
variables in which the presence or absence of one variable (the cause)
determines the presence or absence, or the value, of another variable
(the effect). For a relationship to be causal
three conditions must be met:
- A strong correlation must exist between the proposed cause and the effect.
- The proposed cause must occur before the effect.
- The cause must always be present when the effect occurs.
For example, the authors of a study designed to help improve functional
health status of older women with CHD wished to show that their special
intervention (SI), based on the theory of self-regulation, was
responsible for any improvements (Clark, Janz, Dodge, et al., 2000). In
other words, they wished to show that their SI (the IV) caused the effects on older women’s functional health status (the DV). To demonstrate that relationship, they had to control other variables or other competing possible
causes of women’s improvements in functional health status. This
control can be accomplished by inclusion and exclusion criteria that
determine who can be in the study. Making study participants as similar
as possible on selected characteristics minimizes the competing
possible causes.
In the basic sciences the assumption that a single cause brings about a single effect may hold true. But, in the applied sciences research conducted with human beings indicates that the relationships between cause and effect variables
are much more complex and that multicausality is a better perspective from which to explore human behavior.
- Multicausality – This perspective acknowledges that more than one variable can be the cause of an effect. In the above example, after finding that the SI indeed caused the effect of
improving the functional health status of older women with CHD, the
researchers could expand their understanding to include other causal
factors by providing the SI to other groups of patients, such as older
women with diabetes or older men with CHD. As the evidence in support
of other causes of the effect accumulates, so does support for the
theory of multicausality. Characteristics of studies examining multicausality include:
- Inclusion of more independent variables than a study based on causality
- Complex hypotheses with two or more independent variables.
- Probability – This perspective also addresses the cause and effect relationship but looks at it from a relative versus an absolute standpoint. Rather than saying that X always
causes Y, in probability theory X causes Y under
specified circumstances. Using the example of the SI designed to
improve older women’s functional health status, the researchers could
plan to evaluate the effect of the SI given at varying points in the
trajectory of cardiac illness (after a first MI or with a diagnosis of
congestive heart failure) and in women who were partnered or without
partners. They may conclude that the SI is more effective in partnered
women who have experienced an MI. Characteristics of a study from the
perspective of probability theory would include:
- Inclusion of multiple independent variables.
- Complex hypotheses with multiple independent variables.
|